TOOLS: newsgator

Based on an advice of Laurent, I’m now testing newsgator, which is at the same time a news agregator and a blog publishing tool (this post is realized in newsgator). What’s really cool is that this tool is completely integrated in Outlook and has a publishing plug-in for blogger. Other ones already exist for Radio, .Text, MovablePoster, etc. (see here for the complete list).

First impression: the agregator part is well integrated in Outlook and very easy to set-up. The publishing part seems to be ok! I will use this tool for a while, stay tuned for more information in some days!

Second impression (after the first publishing): I have to check some details about the post process, specially the formatting and title parts ;-)

BUSINESS: managers who just complain all the time….

As promised, I would like to write down some thoughts about an article – Reclaim your job – from S. Ghoshal and H. Bruch published in the Harvard Business Review from March 2004.

I like this article because it talks about the so-called managers (uhm, have you noticed – manager – not leader ;-) who just complain all the time about:

  • lack of time
  • lack of resources
  • lack of opportunity
  • lack of control
  • lack of influence possibilities
  • lack of freedom
  • I am sure that you also meet regularly this kind of managers ;-) Bruch and Ghoshal made a quite impressive analyse about these points and found out, as expected, that….these are just excuses! This kind of boring reaction is mainly due to a lack of self-confidence and/or inhibition due to risks.

    On the opposite, the two authors tried to identify which are the most important elements to be able to reach some success, instead of loosing time, focus and energy by complaining all the time. Three blocks crystallized:

  • deal with demands:


  • – have our tasks under control and to manage the expectations of our stakeholders

    – proactivity (acting, instead of re-acting mindset)

    – go away from the desire to be indispensable

    – busy to effective work

    – learn to say simply “no”

  • generate resources:


  • – try to find new way to receive resources (money, people, mgmt attention, etc.)

    – out-of-the-box, no can’t do mindset

    – no limitation, break the rules

    – choose a patient, methodical, out-of-the-box approach

  • recognize and exploit alternatives


  • – understand well the corporate strategy

    – present alternatives to serve it efficiently

    – base = strong expertise in a specific field

    Waou, I find this framework really interesting and reproductible based on by own experience.

    BUSINESS: Sumantra Ghoshal died unexpectedly on March 3rd 2004….

    We all have lost one of the major out-of-the-box thinker in the field of strategic leadership, I mean Mr. Sumantra Ghoshal, who died unexpectedly on March 3rd 2004…..

    I was preparing a blog concerning his last great article in the Harvard Business Review from March 2004, co-authored with Heike Bruch, Reclaim your job, when I found this painful information on the Harvard Business Review’s web site.

    Do you know Sumantra Ghoshal? I personaly really like this guy and you HAVE to read at least two of his books, both co-authored with Christopher Bartlett:

    Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution

    The Individualized Corporation: A fundamentally new approach to Management.

    I will publish my blog concerning the mentionned article in a few days.

    BUSINESS: P2P is NOT destroying the CDs’ business!

    Two researchers, F. Oberholzer from Harvard and K. Strumpf from the University of North Carolina, published recently a Harvard Business School study about the music companies’ allegation that the Internet file sharing is responsible for the drastic reduction in sales. They proved that this connection simply doesn’t exist!!

    Downloads have an effect on sales which is statistically indistinguishable from zero, despite rather precise estimates. Moreover, these estimates are of moderate economic significance and are inconsistent with claims that file sharing is the primary reason for the recent decline in music sales.

    TECHNOLOGY: Tera Computing

    In February 2004, Pat Gelsinger – the CTO of Intel – presented some great inputs concerning the future developments in the field of processor during the last Intel Developer Forum.

    Do we really need the increasing power of processors? – yes

    Based on the experience made in the past, the increase in processor power is always used by / surpassed by innovation and new tecnologies. The offer is somewhat creating the demand, as with Microsoft products.

    Incredible volume of digital data

    The volume of digital data is already today surpassing the volume of non-digital data (study from Berkeley in 2003). Almost all new data are digital ones. Some figures to illustrate this:

  • 1 petabytes = 1 PB = 10^15 bytes = 1’000 TB = 1’000’000 GB
  • 1 exabytes = 1 EB = 1’000 PB
  • Internet represents today about 530 PB
  • The WWW itself: 170 PB
  • For saving one year of telephone callsm, you need 17 EB
  • For saving your personal lifetime medical record, you need about 4 EB
  • Not enough?

    Personally, I have:

  • More than 8’000 digital pictures and more than 80 GB of personal digital movies (in 2 years). And I’m sure, a lot of people have really more than that!!
  • I have at home more than 630 GB HD.

    => This huge amount of digital data – “Era of Tera” – requests high-efficient IT computing.

    Architecture of high-efficient computing

    Till today, the existing systems are constrained to use different algorithms and architectures to be able to be “efficient”. On the opposite, the new requests due to the “Era of Tera” can be defined by three general charateristics:

  • Teraflops of processing
  • High data bandwidth
  • Efficient execution and / or adaptation to variable workload requirements
  • => These new common characteristics will allow a common definition of one new unique architecture which will be able to compute the Tera-requests.

    Performance development

    How can we define performance in the field of processor?

    In the past, there was a clear concentration on speed increase, although some architectural improvements also appeared (hyper-threading, MMX technology, etc.). Some major obstacles are appearing now with frequencies increases and size of transistors decreases:

  • power will be a limiting factor
  • memory latency (the difference between the frequency speed of memory and processor is permanently increasing)
  • scalar performance is more and more an issue: instructions per clock trend down with the increase of frequency
  • Consequently:

    – performance increase has mainly to come from architectural innovations (rather than frequency increase)

    – or disruptive change in the processor technology (eg.: photonic computing)

    Conclusion

    “A massively multicore architecture in which each core has multiple threads of execution with minimal memory latency, resistance-capacitance interconnect delay, and controlled thermal activity is needed to deliver teraflop performance”.