So, after 6 days, we got our phone line back this morning, as planned. Wow, it was strange to be at home without any connection, which is completely different as being offline during holidays :-)
Now, a lot of interesting stuff to read and study!
Hi all
I am really sorry, we had so much snow on last Sunday and Monday that our telephone line broke…. That means, no telephone anymore at home, which is definitely not a problem, but also no DSL and Internet, which is definitely an issue!!
I have to wait till Friday that France Telecom is coming by us to repair the broken line. 6 days, that is again a cool service….
Anyway, I can imagine that they have a *lot* of other cases, and that some of them are prio.1 in comparison to our case.
Till Friday, no post :-)
Take care, Didier
[via Seth Godin]
It is about perception :-)
Today Tom Peters quotes from one of my favorite books, The Art of Possibility, “A shoe factory sends two marketing scouts to a region of Africa to study the prospects for expanding business. One sends back a telegram saying, SITUATION HOPELESS STOP NO ONE WEARS SHOES. The other writes back triumphantly, GLORIOUS BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY STOP THEY HAVE NO SHOES.”
[via BetaNews]
The online user-created encyclopedia Wikipedia racked up its 1 millionth English language article on Wednesday, marking a significant milestone for a service that has faced much controversy over the years. The article covered the Jordanhill railway station in Scotland and was authored by Ewan Macdonald.
Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization behind the project, says a total of 3.3 million articles are under development in more than 125 languages. “Although its method of editing is new and controversial, Wikipedia has already won acclaim and awards for its detailed coverage of current events, popular culture, and scientific topics; its usability; and its international community of contributors,” the Foundation said in a statement.
Wow, my blog is exactly two years old :-)
First post on….March 1, 2004!
What represents these 2 years?
So, thank you *very much* for taking some time here, you are always welcome.
[via Russell]
Wow, very good perspective from Russell about all the web-2.0-stuff.
The worst thing about all the Web 2.0 hype is the complete loss of business perspective. There’s a few companies out there that seem to get it but just about every other new website I’ve seen lately is nothing but features parading as businesses. Sure, these guys get to be entered in the “Flip It Quick Acquisition Lottery”, but beyond that, none seem to be creating anything of any real value. […]
But let’s think of some of the popular new site launches lately… web chat and IM comes to mind. WTF is the business? All those Map mashups out there? WTF is the business? Calendaring and Ajax desktops? WTF is the business? They’re just FEATURES built on top of other company’s APIs, adding very little real value, and not making a dime of profit. […]
But say you do have something cool, and your new innovation has that 10x improvement that a new service needs to really take off. Not that there’s a lot of this out there, but still. You can create a new website, fill it with all the goodness in the world, be good to your users, and be a good netizen and use every open standard there is while you’re at it, if at the end of the day your users didn’t put money into your bank account, it’s a useless waste of time for everyone involved. I mean, hey, if you want to create the next non-profit service like Wikipedia, all the more power too you. But if you want to get VC cash, an office in downtown Palo Alto, do a bunch of development, attract lots of users and pretend you’re a business? Then act like one, create something of real value and make some real money from it.
I specially like the last proposal from Russell (hey, I am not ironical) :-)
But I really do think there should be a litmus test for new web apps launched from now on – something very basic and if they don’t pass, they don’t qualify for any buzz or linkage. It’s a simple test: Will they take my credit card? That’s it. I don’t care if they have advertisers or sponsors or god knows what else, all I want to see is a place where I can type in my credit card for some service.
Rodrigo is right, it is important to notice that Ingrid Betancourt (Wikipedia, official website) is still held after 4 years, completely crazy.
Can you imagine what 4 years are ? If you were 4 years younger ? If you hadn’t lived your last 4 years as a free human being ? Actually leave everyone else uninformed about your life ?
Ingrid Betancourt was taken hostage over 4 years ago. And so have many more thousands of innocents in the jungles of Columbia. Time to remember them and do something.
[via InfoWorld]
Tim Bray (Wikipedia, Blog) was interviewed by InfoWorld this week. Wow, *very* interesting inputs about Open Source, XML, RSS, and his understanding of the Software-Industry. Worth a read!
Tim Bray is director of Web Technologies at Sun Microsystems, but is perhaps best known as a co-inventor of XML. He also has launched one of the first public Web search engines, Open Text Index, and founded Antarctica Systems, specializing in visualization-based business analytics. Additionally, Bray publishes a blog and co-chairs the IETF AtomPub (Atom Publishing Format and Publishing Protocol) Working Group, which is focused on technologies for editing Web resources such as blogs and wikis.
the different kinds of business models you have around software are not specifically a function of whether it’s open source or closed source. I think even if you wanted to do traditional capital cost software licensing, the kind of thing that Oracle still makes a living on, there’s no reason in principle you couldn’t do that and still have the product [be] open source and anybody could download it and compile themselves. […]
Open source is a good characteristic for software in general to have. It seems like we’re all beginning to agree, and our plans for making money from software do include open source by and large. […]
Q: Can you make money just selling support without taking any money for the software itself?
A: Well, we think so. Yes. Absolutely.
The historical model of trying to make your money by software [rights] to use licensing costs, I really do think that’s going to become increasingly unsustainable. Trying to cause people to pay money for something that is duplicated and the cost is zero, is at some level profoundly unnatural. And another issue that has always bothered me as a person who’s been not just a technologist but a business executive, software licensing tends to produce some profoundly bad accounting. […]
So the question of how you would maximize the revenue for the competitive marketplace is one I don’t think we know the answer to yet. We’re betting that closed source is sufficiently unnatural in the long haul, that open source is the way it’s going to end up.
And so the population of people in the world who actually knew SGML and understood the Web was maybe 12 people. So that was the 12 people that ended up on the working group, and I co-edited the specs. I’m a co-editor of XML 1.0. And we basically took SGML, threw away the 90 percent that nobody ever used, made it a little bit more Web-friendly, addressed things with URLs, and that was XML. […]
Has [XML] exceeded our expectations? Oh, my goodness, yes. We thought we were building something that would enable somewhat more efficient publishing of Web pages to multiple devices and so on, and the explosion of creativity and energy around XML has wildly exceeded anything we could have possibly dreamed.
The world’s most successful XML application right at the moment is RSS. In terms of the volume of data, the number of feeds, and that is a huge source of change, not just on the technology front, but also culturally. The notion that we have a communication commons where anybody can write and there are no gatekeepers.
